Article content material
Do politicians ever take heed to their very own inane, irrelevant utterances? I believe not, in any other case they’d not often spout a lot hypocritical nonsense.
Within the Commons, Liberal Mark Gerretsen decries all of the oppositions’ dissatisfaction with David Johnston and (at the very least perceived) a scarcity of impartiality and independence. He particularly derides Conservative assaults on Johnston, given Stephen Harper appointed Johnston as governor-general.
Apples and oranges, Gerretsen! That appointment concerned no actual or perceived bias or battle of curiosity. Given Johnston’s “Trudeau household and basis” connections, that notion of bias or battle does exist together with his rapporteur position and report.
Then think about hypocrite Jagmeet Singh. Again and again, he has acknowledged Trudeau should accede to NDP needs or (Singh) “will do no matter it takes” to maintain the Liberals onside of their confidence-and-supply settlement (a.ok.a. coalition). Now Singh, amongst others, is demanding elimination of Johnston as rapporteur. Sadly, Singh lacks the cajones to leverage Trudeau to behave by withdrawing from the “coalition” if Johnston stays. So long as Singh fails to play his trump card, Justin Trudeau sees him for what he’s — a toothless paper tiger — and acts accordingly, i.e. ignores Singh and does no matter he desires. Clearly, Singh is frightened of and received’t threat an election, but he calls Pierre Poilievre’s actions self-serving.
Article content material
Lastly, Johnston himself, as soon as the vice-regal consultant, now intimates he’ll end his rapporteur position. That is in direct defiance of a majority vote of Parliament — the voice and can of the individuals!
(Sure, Mr. Johnston appears a bit confused about tips on how to interpret motions within the Home of Commons.)
SPECIAL FORCES NOT LIKE US
Re: Canadian particular forces leaders warned about ‘untouchable’ troopers who’ve escaped punishment for wrongdoing, on-line version, Might 29
Solely on this nation can we attempt to dismantle or, on the very least, insist our army conforms to what most think about required behaviour.
These particular forces aren’t like us, nor ought to they be. They’re requested to do probably the most repulsive of jobs whereas prepared to place their households second and their mission first.
Take into account it like this: For most individuals who get pleasure from meat, a visit to the abattoir might not sit effectively with them, however you’ll be able to’t have one with out the opposite.
I don’t imagine they’re above reproach, however they need to be afforded extra leniency than the remainder of us.
(However, in the event you bend your requirements, the place does it finish? What’s the road? Tough questions.)
YOU SAID IT: Not Notley
YOU SAID IT: Holidays parked